Resources/Learn/vllm-vs-ctranslate2-choosing-the-right-inference-engine-for-efficient-llm-serving

vLLM vs. CTranslate2: Choosing the Right Inference Engine for Efficient LLM Serving

November 7, 2024
1
mins read
Aishwarya Goel
CoFounder & CEO
Rajdeep Borgohain
DevRel Engineer
Table of contents
Subscribe to our blog
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.

Introduction

This blog explores two inference libraries: vLLM and CTranslate2. Both are designed to optimize the deployment and execution of LLMs, focusing on speed and efficiency.

vLLM, developed at UC Berkeley, introduces PagedAttention and Continuous Batching to improve inference speed and memory usage. It supports distributed inference across multiple GPUs.

CTranslate2 is a high-performance inference engine developed by the OpenNMT, optimized for Transformer models.  It focuses on providing efficient execution on both CPU and GPU, enabling efficient processing of large language models.

Comparison Analysis

Performance Metrics

vLLM and CTranslate2 are popular solutions for deploying large language models (LLMs), renowned for their efficiency and performance. We will compare them based latency, throughput, and time to first token (TTFT):

Features

Both vLLM and CTranslate2 offer robust capabilities for serving large language models efficiently. Below is a detailed comparison of their features.

Ease of Use

Scalability

Integration

Conclusion

Both vLLM and CTranslate2 offer powerful solutions for serving large language models (LLMs), each with unique strengths tailored to different deployment needs. vLLM stands out with its innovative features like PagedAttention and Continuous Batching, which significantly enhance inference speed and memory efficiency. Its cloud-agnostic design and support for a wide range of hardware platforms make it a versatile choice for organizations seeking to optimize LLM deployment.On the other hand, CTranslate2 offers compelling advantages, focus on efficient execution across both CPUs and GPUs makes it a versatile choice for organizations that need a balance of performance and resource management.Ultimately, the choice between vLLM and CTranslate2 will depend on specific project requirements, including performance metrics, ease of use, and existing infrastructure. As the demand for efficient LLM serving continues to grow, both libraries are poised to play critical roles in advancing AI applications across various industries.

Resources

  1. https://opennmt.net/CTranslate2/
  2. https://github.com/OpenNMT/CTranslate2/
  3. https://www.restack.io/p/ctransformers-knowledge-gpu-performance-cat-ai
  4. https://forum.opennmt.net/t/finetuning-bigger-models-with-lora-low-rank-adaptation-in-opennmt-py/5258
  5. https://domino.ai/blog/llm-inference-with-ctranslate2-vllm-huggingface

Introduction

This blog explores two inference libraries: vLLM and CTranslate2. Both are designed to optimize the deployment and execution of LLMs, focusing on speed and efficiency.

vLLM, developed at UC Berkeley, introduces PagedAttention and Continuous Batching to improve inference speed and memory usage. It supports distributed inference across multiple GPUs.

CTranslate2 is a high-performance inference engine developed by the OpenNMT, optimized for Transformer models.  It focuses on providing efficient execution on both CPU and GPU, enabling efficient processing of large language models.

Comparison Analysis

Performance Metrics

vLLM and CTranslate2 are popular solutions for deploying large language models (LLMs), renowned for their efficiency and performance. We will compare them based latency, throughput, and time to first token (TTFT):

Features

Both vLLM and CTranslate2 offer robust capabilities for serving large language models efficiently. Below is a detailed comparison of their features.

Ease of Use

Scalability

Integration

Conclusion

Both vLLM and CTranslate2 offer powerful solutions for serving large language models (LLMs), each with unique strengths tailored to different deployment needs. vLLM stands out with its innovative features like PagedAttention and Continuous Batching, which significantly enhance inference speed and memory efficiency. Its cloud-agnostic design and support for a wide range of hardware platforms make it a versatile choice for organizations seeking to optimize LLM deployment.On the other hand, CTranslate2 offers compelling advantages, focus on efficient execution across both CPUs and GPUs makes it a versatile choice for organizations that need a balance of performance and resource management.Ultimately, the choice between vLLM and CTranslate2 will depend on specific project requirements, including performance metrics, ease of use, and existing infrastructure. As the demand for efficient LLM serving continues to grow, both libraries are poised to play critical roles in advancing AI applications across various industries.

Resources

  1. https://opennmt.net/CTranslate2/
  2. https://github.com/OpenNMT/CTranslate2/
  3. https://www.restack.io/p/ctransformers-knowledge-gpu-performance-cat-ai
  4. https://forum.opennmt.net/t/finetuning-bigger-models-with-lora-low-rank-adaptation-in-opennmt-py/5258
  5. https://domino.ai/blog/llm-inference-with-ctranslate2-vllm-huggingface

Table of contents